Sunk-Cost Cyril
SUNK COST — *refusing to change course because of past investment.* The fallacy of *letting unrecoverable past costs determine current decisions when they should be evaluated independently.*
Chapter 13 — Cyril and the Past-Investment Trap
Cyril is a small (adult-coded) capybara character with a habit of clinging to bad decisions because of past effort already spent. Cautionary archetype, NOT villain.
He is medium-sized, warm-brown-and-cream, steady-eyed-quietly-stubborn, fond-of-justifying-past-investment. His signature move: when something obviously isn’t working, Cyril argues for continuing because of how much has already been invested. “I’ve already spent 3 hours on this project; I can’t quit now.” But the 3 hours are gone either way — they shouldn’t determine whether the next 3 hours are well spent.
This is load-bearing. Cyril embodies the sunk-cost fallacy. Past unrecoverable costs are not relevant to current decisions; only future costs and benefits should matter. Behavioral economics shows humans systematically fall into this — Kahneman + Tversky’s loss-aversion research.
Critical: Cyril teaches via embodied example: “I do this when I’m reluctant to admit a decision was wrong. We all do this sometimes. The skill is evaluating future from here, not past from there.”
Detection scaffolds:
- Is the argument for continuing based on FUTURE benefit or PAST investment?
- Past costs are gone regardless. They don’t influence whether future costs are worth it.
- Loss-aversion psychology. Humans hate admitting losses; sunk-cost fallacy is loss-aversion in action.
- Sometimes continuing IS right. (When the project genuinely will succeed if continued. The discipline is evaluate from future, not past.)
He is explicit: “I am a teaching archetype, NOT a villain. Past investment is gone either way. Evaluate from future, not past.”
“It is not hard. It is future from here, not past from there.”
Voice register
Guidance: Adult-coded, steady-eyed-quietly-stubborn. Capybara. CAUTIONARY ARCHETYPE.
Sample lines:
- “I’ve already spent so much on this; I can’t quit now.”
- “Past investment is gone either way.”
- “Evaluate from future, not past.”
Arc
- Kit 13 — Anchor.
- Kits 14-16 — Recurring.
Relationships
- Alliance: Other cast.
Cultural-sensitivity gate
Anti-blame framing.
Cultural-context note
Sunk-cost fallacy formalized in behavioral economics (Kahneman + Tversky, prospect theory 1979). Universal human cognitive pattern. Distinguished from rational continuation per Bayesian decision theory.
The LogicQuest ensemble
Sunk-Cost Cyril is part of LogicQuest's distributed-narrative cast. Each character embodies a different curricular primitive; together they teach the full subject.
-
Ad Hominem Hannibal
Attacking the arguer, not the argument
-
Strawman Stella
Misrepresenting the opponent's argument
-
Slippery-Slope Sam
Chaining dire consequences from a small first step
-
Appeal-to-Authority Auntie
Citing irrelevant / unqualified authority as proof
-
Red-Herring Reggie
Deflecting to an irrelevant topic
-
Circular-Reasoning Cici
Assuming the conclusion in the premise
-
False-Dichotomy Fia
Presenting only two options when more exist
-
Bandwagon Bran
Truth-by-popularity
-
Whataboutism Wanda
Deflecting criticism via someone else's wrongdoing
-
Equivocator Eva
Sliding a word's meaning mid-argument
-
Tu-Quoque Tessa
"You too!" — dismissing criticism by accusing the critic of the same thing
-
Modus-Ponens Mo
If P then Q; P; ∴ Q
-
Modus-Tollens Tara
If P then Q; ¬Q; ∴ ¬P
-
Syllogism Solon
All M are P; all S are M; ∴ all S are P
-
Disjunctive-Syllogism Dior
P ∨ Q; ¬P; ∴ Q